Overall
- Charleston
- 88.7
- Springfield
- 88.6
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Springfield is 0.1% less expensive than Charleston.
Springfield, MO is 0.1% less expensive than Charleston, WV on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.6 vs 88.7). A $100,000 salary in Charleston buys about the same as $99,851 in Springfield; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WV:MO 88.7→88.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Charleston, WV and Springfield, MO are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Springfield is 14.2 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Charleston corresponds to $99,851 in Springfield.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff -2.1 RPP
Diff -5.9 RPP
Diff +14.2 RPP
| Category | Charleston | Springfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.7 | 88.6 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 94.2 | -2.1 |
| Services | 91.7 | 85.8 | -5.9 |
| Rents | 51.4 | 65.6 | +14.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Charleston and Springfield share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.0 to 0.1 RPP points. Charleston remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 15.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (9.3 to 5.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Charleston RPP | Springfield RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 90.7 | 91.7 | 1.0 points Springfield higher |
| 2012 | 93.4 | 90.8 | 2.6 points Charleston higher |
| 2016 | 92.7 | 89.5 | 3.2 points Charleston higher |
| 2020 | 87.4 | 88.5 | 1.1 points Springfield higher |
| 2024 | 88.7 | 88.6 | 0.1 points Charleston higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Charleston would need to be in Springfield for the same purchasing power:
| In Charleston | In Springfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,926 | $-74 |
| $75,000 | $74,888 | $-112 |
| $100,000 | $99,851 | $-149 |
| $150,000 | $149,777 | $-223 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.7 → 88.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Springfield is 0.1% less expensive than Charleston. The overall cost index is 88.6 vs 88.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Charleston has the same purchasing power as $99,851 in Springfield. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Charleston are indexed at 51.4 while Springfield is at 65.6 (national average = 100). Springfield has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.