Champaign-Urbana vs Greensboro-High Point

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Greensboro-High Point is 0.2% more expensive than Champaign-Urbana.

0.2% more expensive

Greensboro-High Point, NC is 0.2% more expensive than Champaign-Urbana, IL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.9 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Champaign-Urbana buys about the same as $100,174 in Greensboro-High Point; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 92.7 (Champaign-Urbana) vs 92.9 (Greensboro-High Point)
  • $100k in Champaign-Urbana ≈ $100,174 purchasing power in Greensboro-High Point
  • Goods drives the gap (+3.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:NC 92.7→92.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE IL × NC
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Champaign-Urbana
92.7
Cost Index
Greensboro-High Point
92.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Champaign-Urbana, IL and Greensboro-High Point, NC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Goods creates the largest separation: Greensboro-High Point is 3.0 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $100,174 in Greensboro-High Point as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Champaign-Urbana, then replace the national basket with your own.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Champaign-Urbana
92.7
Greensboro-High Point
92.9
Goods
Champaign-Urbana
93.6
Greensboro-High Point
96.6
Services
Champaign-Urbana
90.5
Greensboro-High Point
89.1
Rents
Champaign-Urbana
71.6
Greensboro-High Point
74.5

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Champaign-Urbana would need to be in Greensboro-High Point for the same purchasing power:

In Champaign-Urbana In Greensboro-High Point Difference
$50,000 $50,087 +$87
$75,000 $75,130 +$130
$100,000 $100,174 +$174
$150,000 $150,261 +$261
$ in Champaign-Urbana = in Greensboro-High Point

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 92.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Greensboro-High Point more expensive than Champaign-Urbana?

Greensboro-High Point is 0.2% more expensive than Champaign-Urbana. The overall cost index is 92.9 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Greensboro-High Point equals $100K in Champaign-Urbana?

A $100,000 salary in Champaign-Urbana has the same purchasing power as $100,174 in Greensboro-High Point. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Champaign-Urbana and Greensboro-High Point?

Rents in Champaign-Urbana are indexed at 71.6 while Greensboro-High Point is at 74.5 (national average = 100). Greensboro-High Point has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.