Overall
- Chambersburg
- 94.6
- Pittsfield
- 95.1
Diff +0.5 RPP
Chambersburg vs Pittsfield
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Pittsfield is 0.5% more expensive than Chambersburg.
0.5% more expensive
Pittsfield, MA is 0.5% more expensive than Chambersburg, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.1 vs 94.6). A $100,000 salary in Chambersburg buys about the same as $100,490 in Pittsfield; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 94.6 (Chambersburg) vs 95.1 (Pittsfield)
- $100k in Chambersburg ≈ $100,490 purchasing power in Pittsfield
- Services drives the gap (+45.4 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair PA:MA 94.6→95.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE PA × MA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Chambersburg
94.6
Cost Index
Pittsfield
95.1
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Chambersburg, PA and Pittsfield, MA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Pittsfield is 45.4 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Chambersburg to $100,490 in Pittsfield, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Chambersburg
- 100.7
- Pittsfield
- 97.0
Diff -3.7 RPP
Services
- Chambersburg
- 108.3
- Pittsfield
- 153.7
Diff +45.4 RPP
Rents
- Chambersburg
- 71.9
- Pittsfield
- 73.5
Diff +1.5 RPP
| Category | Chambersburg | Pittsfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 94.6 | 95.1 | +0.5 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 97.0 | -3.7 |
| Services | 108.3 | 153.7 | +45.4 |
| Rents | 71.9 | 73.5 | +1.5 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Chambersburg 94.6
Pittsfield 95.1
Goods
Chambersburg 100.7
Pittsfield 97.0
Services
Chambersburg 108.3
Pittsfield 153.7
Rents
Chambersburg 71.9
Pittsfield 73.5
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Chambersburg would need to be in Pittsfield for the same purchasing power:
| In Chambersburg | In Pittsfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,245 | +$245 |
| $75,000 | $75,368 | +$368 |
| $100,000 | $100,490 | +$490 |
| $150,000 | $150,735 | +$735 |
$ in Chambersburg = in Pittsfield
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.6 → 95.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pittsfield more expensive than Chambersburg?
Pittsfield is 0.5% more expensive than Chambersburg. The overall cost index is 95.1 vs 94.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Pittsfield equals $100K in Chambersburg?
A $100,000 salary in Chambersburg has the same purchasing power as $100,490 in Pittsfield. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Chambersburg and Pittsfield?
Rents in Chambersburg are indexed at 71.9 while Pittsfield is at 73.5 (national average = 100). Pittsfield has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.