Overall
- Buffalo-Cheektowaga
- 95.8
- Columbus
- 95.5
Diff -0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Columbus is 0.4% less expensive than Buffalo-Cheektowaga.
Columbus, OH is 0.4% less expensive than Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.5 vs 95.8). A $100,000 salary in Buffalo-Cheektowaga buys about the same as $99,609 in Columbus; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:OH 95.8→95.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY and Columbus, OH are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Columbus is 34.0 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Buffalo-Cheektowaga to $99,609 in Columbus, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff -6.1 RPP
Diff -34.0 RPP
Diff +7.0 RPP
| Category | Buffalo-Cheektowaga | Columbus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.8 | 95.5 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 93.6 | -6.1 |
| Services | 129.5 | 95.5 | -34.0 |
| Rents | 81.0 | 87.9 | +7.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Buffalo-Cheektowaga would need to be in Columbus for the same purchasing power:
| In Buffalo-Cheektowaga | In Columbus | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,804 | $-196 |
| $75,000 | $74,707 | $-293 |
| $100,000 | $99,609 | $-391 |
| $150,000 | $149,413 | $-587 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.8 → 95.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Columbus is 0.4% less expensive than Buffalo-Cheektowaga. The overall cost index is 95.5 vs 95.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Buffalo-Cheektowaga has the same purchasing power as $99,609 in Columbus. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Buffalo-Cheektowaga are indexed at 81.0 while Columbus is at 87.9 (national average = 100). Columbus has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.