Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 1.8% less expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard.

1.8% less expensive

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 1.8% less expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 105.6). A $100,000 salary in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard buys about the same as $98,166 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 105.6 (Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
  • $100k in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard ≈ $98,166 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
  • Rents drives the gap (-13.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WA:WA 105.6→103.7

PHOTO-FINISH · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • SAME-STATE Same state · WA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
105.6
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.9 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 13.0 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard corresponds to $98,166 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
105.6
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Goods
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
105.0
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
105.0
Services
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
92.0
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
91.7
Rents
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
129.6
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
116.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:

In Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater Difference
$50,000 $49,083 $-917
$75,000 $73,624 $-1,376
$100,000 $98,166 $-1,834
$150,000 $147,249 $-2,751
$ in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (105.6 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard?

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 1.8% less expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 105.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard?

A $100,000 salary in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard has the same purchasing power as $98,166 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

Rents in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard are indexed at 129.6 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.