Overall
- Napa
- 112.6
Diff +6.9 RPP
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard vs Napa
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Napa is 6.6% more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard.
6.6% more expensive
Napa, CA is 6.6% more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 112.6 vs 105.6). A $100,000 salary in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard buys about the same as $106,578 in Napa; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 105.6 (Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard) vs 112.6 (Napa)
- $100k in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard ≈ $106,578 purchasing power in Napa
- Rents drives the gap (+67.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:CA 105.6→112.6
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE WA × CA
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard would need to be in Napa for the same purchasing power:
| In Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard | In Napa | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,289 | +$3,289 |
| $75,000 | $79,934 | +$4,934 |
| $100,000 | $106,578 | +$6,578 |
| $150,000 | $159,867 | +$9,867 |
$ in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard = in Napa
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (105.6 → 112.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Napa, CA is 6.6% more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.9-point overall gap.
Rents leads the difference, with Napa 67.8 points higher than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard corresponds to $106,578 in Napa.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Napa
- 105.2
Diff +0.1 RPP
Services
- Napa
- 156.5
Diff +64.5 RPP
Rents
- Napa
- 197.4
Diff +67.8 RPP
| Category | Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard | Napa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 105.6 | 112.6 | +6.9 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 105.2 | +0.1 |
| Services | 92.0 | 156.5 | +64.5 |
| Rents | 129.6 | 197.4 | +67.8 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard 105.6
Napa 112.6
Goods
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard 105.0
Napa 105.2
Services
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard 92.0
Napa 156.5
Rents
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard 129.6
Napa 197.4
Vertical line = national average (100)
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
105.6
Cost Index
Napa
112.6
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard and Napa share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 8.2 to 6.9 RPP points. Napa remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 50.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (17.4 to 67.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard RPP | Napa RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 107.0 | 115.2 | 8.2 points Napa higher |
| 2012 | 103.6 | 111.6 | 8.0 points Napa higher |
| 2016 | 107.1 | 117.8 | 10.7 points Napa higher |
| 2020 | 105.4 | 112.2 | 6.9 points Napa higher |
| 2024 | 105.6 | 112.6 | 6.9 points Napa higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Napa more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard?
Napa is 6.6% more expensive than Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard. The overall cost index is 112.6 vs 105.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Napa equals $100K in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard?
A $100,000 salary in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard has the same purchasing power as $106,578 in Napa. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard and Napa?
Rents in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard are indexed at 129.6 while Napa is at 197.4 (national average = 100). Napa has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.