Overall
- Bowling Green
- 90.2
- Clarksville
- 90.9
Diff +0.8 RPP
Bowling Green vs Clarksville
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Clarksville is 0.9% more expensive than Bowling Green.
0.9% more expensive
Clarksville, TN-KY is 0.9% more expensive than Bowling Green, KY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.9 vs 90.2). A $100,000 salary in Bowling Green buys about the same as $100,852 in Clarksville; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 90.2 (Bowling Green) vs 90.9 (Clarksville)
- $100k in Bowling Green ≈ $100,852 purchasing power in Clarksville
- Rents drives the gap (+10.4 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair KY:TN 90.2→90.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE KY × TN
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Bowling Green
90.2
Cost Index
Clarksville
90.9
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Bowling Green, KY and Clarksville, TN-KY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Clarksville is 10.4 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Bowling Green corresponds to $100,852 in Clarksville.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Bowling Green
- 96.2
- Clarksville
- 96.2
Diff +0.0 RPP
Services
- Bowling Green
- 75.2
- Clarksville
- 72.5
Diff -2.7 RPP
Rents
- Bowling Green
- 63.4
- Clarksville
- 73.8
Diff +10.4 RPP
| Category | Bowling Green | Clarksville | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.2 | 90.9 | +0.8 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 96.2 | +0.0 |
| Services | 75.2 | 72.5 | -2.7 |
| Rents | 63.4 | 73.8 | +10.4 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Bowling Green 90.2
Clarksville 90.9
Goods
Bowling Green 96.2
Clarksville 96.2
Services
Bowling Green 75.2
Clarksville 72.5
Rents
Bowling Green 63.4
Clarksville 73.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
How the Price Gap Changed
Bowling Green and Clarksville share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.9 to 0.8 RPP points. Clarksville remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (8.3 to 2.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Bowling Green RPP | Clarksville RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 86.6 | 90.5 | 3.9 points Clarksville higher |
| 2012 | 88.7 | 93.0 | 4.3 points Clarksville higher |
| 2016 | 87.3 | 93.6 | 6.3 points Clarksville higher |
| 2020 | 89.4 | 88.8 | 0.7 points Bowling Green higher |
| 2024 | 90.2 | 90.9 | 0.8 points Clarksville higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Bowling Green would need to be in Clarksville for the same purchasing power:
| In Bowling Green | In Clarksville | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,426 | +$426 |
| $75,000 | $75,639 | +$639 |
| $100,000 | $100,852 | +$852 |
| $150,000 | $151,277 | +$1,277 |
$ in Bowling Green = in Clarksville
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.2 → 90.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Clarksville more expensive than Bowling Green?
Clarksville is 0.9% more expensive than Bowling Green. The overall cost index is 90.9 vs 90.2 (national average = 100).
What salary in Clarksville equals $100K in Bowling Green?
A $100,000 salary in Bowling Green has the same purchasing power as $100,852 in Clarksville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Bowling Green and Clarksville?
Rents in Bowling Green are indexed at 63.4 while Clarksville is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Clarksville has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.