Boise City vs Rome

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rome is 8.4% less expensive than Boise City.

8.4% less expensive

Rome, GA is 8.4% less expensive than Boise City, ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.2 vs 98.4). A $100,000 salary in Boise City buys about the same as $91,635 in Rome; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 98.4 (Boise City) vs 90.2 (Rome)
  • $100k in Boise City ≈ $91,635 purchasing power in Rome
  • Rents drives the gap (-45.3 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair ID:GA 98.4→90.2

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE ID × GA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Boise City
98.4
Rome
90.2
Goods
Boise City
96.2
Rome
96.3
Services
Boise City
70.7
Rome
90.7
Rents
Boise City
105.6
Rome
60.3

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rents creates the largest separation: Rome is 45.3 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Boise City, ID and Rome, GA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 8.2 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Boise City corresponds to $91,635 in Rome.

Boise City
98.4
Cost Index
Rome
90.2
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Boise City would need to be in Rome for the same purchasing power:

In Boise City In Rome Difference
$50,000 $45,818 $-4,182
$75,000 $68,727 $-6,273
$100,000 $91,635 $-8,365
$150,000 $137,453 $-12,547
$ in Boise City = in Rome

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.4 → 90.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

How the Price Gap Changed

Boise City and Rome share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 7.3 to 8.2 RPP points. Boise City remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 16.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (29.0 to 45.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Boise City RPP Rome RPP Relative Gap
2008 95.3 88.0 7.3 points Boise City higher
2012 96.7 86.3 10.4 points Boise City higher
2016 93.2 88.3 4.9 points Boise City higher
2020 93.6 86.3 7.3 points Boise City higher
2024 98.4 90.2 8.2 points Boise City higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rome more expensive than Boise City?

Rome is 8.4% less expensive than Boise City. The overall cost index is 90.2 vs 98.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Rome equals $100K in Boise City?

A $100,000 salary in Boise City has the same purchasing power as $91,635 in Rome. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Boise City and Rome?

Rents in Boise City are indexed at 105.6 while Rome is at 60.3 (national average = 100). Boise City has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.