Overall
- Boise City
- 98.4
Diff -4.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lake Havasu City-Kingman is 4.4% less expensive than Boise City.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ is 4.4% less expensive than Boise City, ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.1 vs 98.4). A $100,000 salary in Boise City buys about the same as $95,637 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair ID:AZ 98.4→94.1
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -4.3 RPP
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff +18.0 RPP
Diff -25.8 RPP
| Category | Boise City | Lake Havasu City-Kingman | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.4 | 94.1 | -4.3 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 96.2 | +0.1 |
| Services | 70.7 | 88.7 | +18.0 |
| Rents | 105.6 | 79.8 | -25.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Lake Havasu City-Kingman is 25.8 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ is 4.4% less expensive than Boise City, ID, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.3-point overall gap.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Boise City corresponds to $95,637 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman.
What a salary in Boise City would need to be in Lake Havasu City-Kingman for the same purchasing power:
| In Boise City | In Lake Havasu City-Kingman | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,818 | $-2,182 |
| $75,000 | $71,728 | $-3,272 |
| $100,000 | $95,637 | $-4,363 |
| $150,000 | $143,455 | $-6,545 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.4 → 94.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Boise City and Lake Havasu City-Kingman share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 1.5 to 4.3 RPP points. Boise City remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 15.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (10.3 to 25.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Boise City RPP | Lake Havasu City-Kingman RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.3 | 93.8 | 1.5 points Boise City higher |
| 2012 | 96.7 | 95.5 | 1.1 points Boise City higher |
| 2016 | 93.2 | 93.0 | 0.2 points Boise City higher |
| 2020 | 93.6 | 87.7 | 6.0 points Boise City higher |
| 2024 | 98.4 | 94.1 | 4.3 points Boise City higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman is 4.4% less expensive than Boise City. The overall cost index is 94.1 vs 98.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Boise City has the same purchasing power as $95,637 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Boise City are indexed at 105.6 while Lake Havasu City-Kingman is at 79.8 (national average = 100). Boise City has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.