Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford vs Yuma

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yuma is 0% less expensive than Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford.

0% less expensive

Yuma, AZ is 0% less expensive than Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford buys about the same as $99,996 in Yuma; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 92.7 (Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford) vs 92.7 (Yuma)
  • $100k in Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford ≈ $99,996 purchasing power in Yuma
  • Rents drives the gap (-0.6 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair VA:AZ 92.7→92.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE VA × AZ
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford
92.7
Cost Index
Yuma
92.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA and Yuma, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents leads the difference, with Yuma 0.6 points lower than Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford corresponds to $99,996 in Yuma.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford
92.7
Yuma
92.7
Goods
Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford
96.8
Yuma
96.2
Services
Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford
88.1
Yuma
87.8
Rents
Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford
74.4
Yuma
73.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford would need to be in Yuma for the same purchasing power:

In Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford In Yuma Difference
$50,000 $49,998 $-2
$75,000 $74,997 $-3
$100,000 $99,996 $-4
$150,000 $149,994 $-6
$ in Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford = in Yuma

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yuma more expensive than Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford?

Yuma is 0% less expensive than Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Yuma equals $100K in Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford?

A $100,000 salary in Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford has the same purchasing power as $99,996 in Yuma. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford and Yuma?

Rents in Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford are indexed at 74.4 while Yuma is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.