Overall
- Bend
- 103.6
- Waterbury-Shelton
- 99.8
Diff -3.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Waterbury-Shelton is 3.7% less expensive than Bend.
Waterbury-Shelton, CT is 3.7% less expensive than Bend, OR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 99.8 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Bend buys about the same as $96,304 in Waterbury-Shelton; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair OR:CT 103.6→99.8
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -3.8 RPP
Diff -7.9 RPP
Diff +42.6 RPP
Diff -20.8 RPP
| Category | Bend | Waterbury-Shelton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.6 | 99.8 | -3.8 |
| Goods | 105.3 | 97.3 | -7.9 |
| Services | 105.0 | 147.6 | +42.6 |
| Rents | 110.0 | 89.1 | -20.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Waterbury-Shelton is 42.6 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Waterbury-Shelton, CT is 3.7% less expensive than Bend, OR, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.8-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Bend is above 100 while Waterbury-Shelton is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Bend to $96,304 in Waterbury-Shelton, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Bend would need to be in Waterbury-Shelton for the same purchasing power:
| In Bend | In Waterbury-Shelton | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,152 | $-1,848 |
| $75,000 | $72,228 | $-2,772 |
| $100,000 | $96,304 | $-3,696 |
| $150,000 | $144,456 | $-5,544 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 99.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Bend and Waterbury-Shelton share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 11.0 to 3.8 RPP points. Bend remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 44.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (23.2 to 20.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Bend RPP | Waterbury-Shelton RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.8 | 110.8 | 11.0 points Waterbury-Shelton higher |
| 2012 | 95.8 | 106.9 | 11.2 points Waterbury-Shelton higher |
| 2016 | 99.0 | 106.5 | 7.5 points Waterbury-Shelton higher |
| 2020 | 102.9 | 103.4 | 0.5 points Waterbury-Shelton higher |
| 2024 | 103.6 | 99.8 | 3.8 points Bend higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Waterbury-Shelton is 3.7% less expensive than Bend. The overall cost index is 99.8 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Bend has the same purchasing power as $96,304 in Waterbury-Shelton. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Bend are indexed at 110.0 while Waterbury-Shelton is at 89.1 (national average = 100). Bend has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.