Overall
- Bakersfield-Delano
- 100.9
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff +2.8 RPP
Bakersfield-Delano vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 2.8% more expensive than Bakersfield-Delano.
2.8% more expensive
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 2.8% more expensive than Bakersfield-Delano, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 100.9). A $100,000 salary in Bakersfield-Delano buys about the same as $102,760 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 100.9 (Bakersfield-Delano) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
- $100k in Bakersfield-Delano ≈ $102,760 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- Services drives the gap (-66.6 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:WA 100.9→103.7
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE CA × WA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Bakersfield-Delano
- 105.2
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 105.0
Diff -0.1 RPP
Services
- Bakersfield-Delano
- 158.3
Diff -66.6 RPP
Rents
- Bakersfield-Delano
- 90.3
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 116.7
Diff +26.4 RPP
| Category | Bakersfield-Delano | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 103.7 | +2.8 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 105.0 | -0.1 |
| Services | 158.3 | 91.7 | -66.6 |
| Rents | 90.3 | 116.7 | +26.4 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Bakersfield-Delano 100.9
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 103.7
Goods
Bakersfield-Delano 105.2
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 105.0
Services
Bakersfield-Delano 158.3
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 91.7
Rents
Bakersfield-Delano 90.3
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 116.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Services creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 66.6 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 2.8% more expensive than Bakersfield-Delano, CA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.8-point overall gap.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Bakersfield-Delano to $102,760 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Bakersfield-Delano
100.9
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Bakersfield-Delano would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:
| In Bakersfield-Delano | In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,380 | +$1,380 |
| $75,000 | $77,070 | +$2,070 |
| $100,000 | $102,760 | +$2,760 |
| $150,000 | $154,139 | +$4,139 |
$ in Bakersfield-Delano = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.9 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
How the Price Gap Changed
Bakersfield-Delano and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 8.5 to 2.8 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 46.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (19.7 to 66.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Bakersfield-Delano RPP | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 96.9 | 105.4 | 8.5 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2012 | 101.1 | 101.3 | 0.3 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2016 | 96.5 | 106.0 | 9.5 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2020 | 100.3 | 101.9 | 1.6 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2024 | 100.9 | 103.7 | 2.8 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Bakersfield-Delano?
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 2.8% more expensive than Bakersfield-Delano. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 100.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Bakersfield-Delano?
A $100,000 salary in Bakersfield-Delano has the same purchasing power as $102,760 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Bakersfield-Delano and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
Rents in Bakersfield-Delano are indexed at 90.3 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.