Overall
- Auburn-Opelika
- 87.9
Diff +24.6 RPP
Auburn-Opelika vs New York-Newark-Jersey City
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. New York-Newark-Jersey City is 28% more expensive than Auburn-Opelika.
28% more expensive
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ is 28% more expensive than Auburn-Opelika, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 112.6 vs 87.9). A $100,000 salary in Auburn-Opelika buys about the same as $128,010 in New York-Newark-Jersey City; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 87.9 (Auburn-Opelika) vs 112.6 (New York-Newark-Jersey City)
- $100k in Auburn-Opelika ≈ $128,010 purchasing power in New York-Newark-Jersey City
- Rents drives the gap (+86.5 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair AL:NY 87.9→112.6
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-STEEP
- TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
- CROSS-STATE AL × NY
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-STEEP Steep PP convert
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Auburn-Opelika would need to be in New York-Newark-Jersey City for the same purchasing power:
| In Auburn-Opelika | In New York-Newark-Jersey City | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $64,005 | +$14,005 |
| $75,000 | $96,007 | +$21,007 |
| $100,000 | $128,010 | +$28,010 |
| $150,000 | $192,015 | +$42,015 |
$ in Auburn-Opelika = in New York-Newark-Jersey City
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.9 → 112.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Auburn-Opelika, AL and New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 24.6 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: New York-Newark-Jersey City is above 100 while Auburn-Opelika is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with New York-Newark-Jersey City 86.5 points higher than Auburn-Opelika. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Auburn-Opelika corresponds to $128,010 in New York-Newark-Jersey City.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Auburn-Opelika
- 96.4
Diff +13.9 RPP
Services
- Auburn-Opelika
- 83.9
Diff +43.1 RPP
Rents
- Auburn-Opelika
- 62.1
Diff +86.5 RPP
| Category | Auburn-Opelika | New York-Newark-Jersey City | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.9 | 112.6 | +24.6 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 110.3 | +13.9 |
| Services | 83.9 | 127.0 | +43.1 |
| Rents | 62.1 | 148.6 | +86.5 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Auburn-Opelika 87.9
New York-Newark-Jersey City 112.6
Goods
Auburn-Opelika 96.4
New York-Newark-Jersey City 110.3
Services
Auburn-Opelika 83.9
New York-Newark-Jersey City 127.0
Rents
Auburn-Opelika 62.1
New York-Newark-Jersey City 148.6
Vertical line = national average (100)
Auburn-Opelika
87.9
Cost Index
New York-Newark-Jersey City
112.6
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Auburn-Opelika and New York-Newark-Jersey City share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 24.2 to 24.6 RPP points. New York-Newark-Jersey City remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 18.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (61.7 to 43.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Auburn-Opelika RPP | New York-Newark-Jersey City RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 89.3 | 113.5 | 24.2 points New York-Newark-Jersey City higher |
| 2012 | 90.4 | 113.8 | 23.4 points New York-Newark-Jersey City higher |
| 2016 | 89.7 | 113.7 | 24.0 points New York-Newark-Jersey City higher |
| 2020 | 88.7 | 115.6 | 26.9 points New York-Newark-Jersey City higher |
| 2024 | 87.9 | 112.6 | 24.6 points New York-Newark-Jersey City higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is New York-Newark-Jersey City more expensive than Auburn-Opelika?
New York-Newark-Jersey City is 28% more expensive than Auburn-Opelika. The overall cost index is 112.6 vs 87.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in New York-Newark-Jersey City equals $100K in Auburn-Opelika?
A $100,000 salary in Auburn-Opelika has the same purchasing power as $128,010 in New York-Newark-Jersey City. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Auburn-Opelika and New York-Newark-Jersey City?
Rents in Auburn-Opelika are indexed at 62.1 while New York-Newark-Jersey City is at 148.6 (national average = 100). New York-Newark-Jersey City has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.