Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell vs Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler is 3.3% more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA at an overall Regional Price Parity of 100.1 and Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ at 103.3, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler 3.3% more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 3.3 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell indexes goods at 100.4, services at 96.2, and rents at 111.0, while Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler comes in at 95.0, 93.3, and 121.2 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall — Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell has the same purchasing power as $103,256 in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 6,176,937 (Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell) and 4,941,206 (Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler), and median household incomes are $86,338 versus $84,703 respectively — so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.1
Cost Index
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
103.3
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler Difference
Overall 100.1 103.3 +3.3
Goods 100.4 95.0 -5.4
Services 96.2 93.3 -2.9
Rents 111.0 121.2 +10.2

Visual Comparison

Overall
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.1
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
103.3
Goods
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.4
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
95.0
Services
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
96.2
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
93.3
Rents
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
111.0
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
121.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell would need to be in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler for the same purchasing power:

In Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell In Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler Difference
$50,000 $51,628 +$1,628
$75,000 $77,442 +$2,442
$100,000 $103,256 +$3,256
$150,000 $154,884 +$4,884

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
Population 6,176,937 4,941,206
Median Income $86,338 $84,703
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell?
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler is 3.3% more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell. The overall cost index is 103.3 vs 100.1 (national average = 100).
What salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler equals $100K in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell?
A $100,000 salary in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell has the same purchasing power as $103,256 in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell and Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler?
Rents in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell are indexed at 111.0 while Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler is at 121.2 (national average = 100). Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial