Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 3.6% more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA at an overall Regional Price Parity of 100.1 and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA at 103.7, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 3.6% more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 3.6 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell indexes goods at 100.4, services at 96.2, and rents at 111.0, while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater comes in at 105.0, 91.7, and 116.7 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall — Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell has the same purchasing power as $103,610 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 6,176,937 (Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell) and 296,640 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater), and median household incomes are $86,338 versus $93,985 respectively — so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.1
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater Difference
Overall 100.1 103.7 +3.6
Goods 100.4 105.0 +4.6
Services 96.2 91.7 -4.5
Rents 111.0 116.7 +5.7

Visual Comparison

Overall
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.1
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Goods
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.4
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
105.0
Services
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
96.2
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
91.7
Rents
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
111.0
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
116.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:

In Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater Difference
$50,000 $51,805 +$1,805
$75,000 $77,707 +$2,707
$100,000 $103,610 +$3,610
$150,000 $155,415 +$5,415

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Population 6,176,937 296,640
Median Income $86,338 $93,985
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell?
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 3.6% more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 100.1 (national average = 100).
What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell?
A $100,000 salary in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell has the same purchasing power as $103,610 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
Rents in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell are indexed at 111.0 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial