Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell vs Manchester-Nashua

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Manchester-Nashua is 5.6% more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA at an overall Regional Price Parity of 100.1 and Manchester-Nashua, NH at 105.7, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Manchester-Nashua 5.6% more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 5.6 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell indexes goods at 100.4, services at 96.2, and rents at 111.0, while Manchester-Nashua comes in at 97.7, 133.5, and 134.2 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - Manchester-Nashua carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell has the same purchasing power as $105,596 in Manchester-Nashua based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 6,176,937 (Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell) and 424,732 (Manchester-Nashua), and median household incomes are $86,338 versus $100,436 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.1
Cost Index
Manchester-Nashua
105.7
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell Manchester-Nashua Difference
Overall 100.1 105.7 +5.6
Goods 100.4 97.7 -2.7
Services 96.2 133.5 +37.3
Rents 111.0 134.2 +23.2

Visual Comparison

Overall
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.1
Manchester-Nashua
105.7
Goods
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.4
Manchester-Nashua
97.7
Services
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
96.2
Manchester-Nashua
133.5
Rents
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
111.0
Manchester-Nashua
134.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell would need to be in Manchester-Nashua for the same purchasing power:

In Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell In Manchester-Nashua Difference
$50,000 $52,798 +$2,798
$75,000 $79,197 +$4,197
$100,000 $105,596 +$5,596
$150,000 $158,394 +$8,394

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell Manchester-Nashua
Population 6,176,937 424,732
Median Income $86,338 $100,436
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Manchester-Nashua more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell?
Manchester-Nashua is 5.6% more expensive than Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell. The overall cost index is 105.7 vs 100.1 (national average = 100).
What salary in Manchester-Nashua equals $100K in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell?
A $100,000 salary in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell has the same purchasing power as $105,596 in Manchester-Nashua. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell and Manchester-Nashua?
Rents in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell are indexed at 111.0 while Manchester-Nashua is at 134.2 (national average = 100). Manchester-Nashua has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-05-15. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.