Overall
- Asheville
- 96.5
Diff +3.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is 3.6% more expensive than Asheville.
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL is 3.6% more expensive than Asheville, NC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.0 vs 96.5). A $100,000 salary in Asheville buys about the same as $103,626 in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NC:FL 96.5→100.0
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +3.5 RPP
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff -0.6 RPP
Diff +18.4 RPP
| Category | Asheville | Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.5 | 100.0 | +3.5 |
| Goods | 96.6 | 96.2 | -0.4 |
| Services | 88.6 | 88.1 | -0.6 |
| Rents | 93.4 | 111.7 | +18.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is 18.4 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL is 3.6% more expensive than Asheville, NC, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.5-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is above 100 while Asheville is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Asheville corresponds to $103,626 in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville.
What a salary in Asheville would need to be in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville for the same purchasing power:
| In Asheville | In Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,813 | +$1,813 |
| $75,000 | $77,719 | +$2,719 |
| $100,000 | $103,626 | +$3,626 |
| $150,000 | $155,439 | +$5,439 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.5 → 100.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Asheville and Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.6 to 3.5 RPP points. Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (10.7 to 0.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Asheville RPP | Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.4 | 99.9 | 5.6 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
| 2012 | 95.1 | 98.0 | 2.9 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
| 2016 | 96.5 | 98.8 | 2.3 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
| 2020 | 94.1 | 96.8 | 2.7 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
| 2024 | 96.5 | 100.0 | 3.5 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is 3.6% more expensive than Asheville. The overall cost index is 100.0 vs 96.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Asheville has the same purchasing power as $103,626 in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Asheville are indexed at 93.4 while Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is at 111.7 (national average = 100). Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.