Overall
Diff +0.3 RPP
Appleton vs Yuma
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yuma is 0.3% more expensive than Appleton.
0.3% more expensive
Yuma, AZ is 0.3% more expensive than Appleton, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.4). A $100,000 salary in Appleton buys about the same as $100,311 in Yuma; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 92.4 (Appleton) vs 92.7 (Yuma)
- $100k in Appleton ≈ $100,311 purchasing power in Yuma
- Rents drives the gap (+3.0 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair WI:AZ 92.4→92.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE WI × AZ
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Appleton
92.4
Cost Index
Yuma
92.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Appleton, WI and Yuma, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Yuma is 3.0 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Appleton corresponds to $100,311 in Yuma.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +2.4 RPP
Services
Diff -2.8 RPP
Rents
Diff +3.0 RPP
| Category | Appleton | Yuma | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.4 | 92.7 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 96.2 | +2.4 |
| Services | 90.6 | 87.8 | -2.8 |
| Rents | 70.8 | 73.8 | +3.0 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Appleton 92.4
Yuma 92.7
Goods
Appleton 93.8
Yuma 96.2
Services
Appleton 90.6
Yuma 87.8
Rents
Appleton 70.8
Yuma 73.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Appleton would need to be in Yuma for the same purchasing power:
| In Appleton | In Yuma | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,155 | +$155 |
| $75,000 | $75,233 | +$233 |
| $100,000 | $100,311 | +$311 |
| $150,000 | $150,466 | +$466 |
$ in Appleton = in Yuma
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.4 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Yuma more expensive than Appleton?
Yuma is 0.3% more expensive than Appleton. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.4 (national average = 100).
What salary in Yuma equals $100K in Appleton?
A $100,000 salary in Appleton has the same purchasing power as $100,311 in Yuma. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Appleton and Yuma?
Rents in Appleton are indexed at 70.8 while Yuma is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Yuma has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.