Overall
- Ann Arbor
- 100.9
Diff -2.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 2.6% less expensive than Ann Arbor.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 2.6% less expensive than Ann Arbor, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 100.9). A $100,000 salary in Ann Arbor buys about the same as $97,398 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair MI:AZ 100.9→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -2.6 RPP
Diff +2.5 RPP
Diff -6.7 RPP
Diff -26.5 RPP
| Category | Ann Arbor | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 98.3 | -2.6 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 96.2 | +2.5 |
| Services | 98.2 | 91.5 | -6.7 |
| Rents | 125.3 | 98.8 | -26.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Prescott Valley-Prescott is 26.5 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 2.6% less expensive than Ann Arbor, MI, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.6-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Ann Arbor is above 100 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Ann Arbor corresponds to $97,398 in Prescott Valley-Prescott.
What a salary in Ann Arbor would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In Ann Arbor | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,699 | $-1,301 |
| $75,000 | $73,048 | $-1,952 |
| $100,000 | $97,398 | $-2,602 |
| $150,000 | $146,097 | $-3,903 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.9 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Ann Arbor and Prescott Valley-Prescott share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.6 to 2.6 RPP points. Ann Arbor remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (16.2 to 26.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Ann Arbor RPP | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 103.6 | 103.0 | 0.6 points Ann Arbor higher |
| 2012 | 100.9 | 96.5 | 4.3 points Ann Arbor higher |
| 2016 | 98.4 | 98.6 | 0.2 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 98.6 | 93.2 | 5.4 points Ann Arbor higher |
| 2024 | 100.9 | 98.3 | 2.6 points Ann Arbor higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 2.6% less expensive than Ann Arbor. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 100.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Ann Arbor has the same purchasing power as $97,398 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Ann Arbor are indexed at 125.3 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). Ann Arbor has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.