Overall
- Ann Arbor
- 100.9
Diff -0.4 RPP
Ann Arbor vs Norwich-New London-Willimantic
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Norwich-New London-Willimantic is 0.4% less expensive than Ann Arbor.
0.4% less expensive
Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT is 0.4% less expensive than Ann Arbor, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.4 vs 100.9). A $100,000 salary in Ann Arbor buys about the same as $99,569 in Norwich-New London-Willimantic; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 100.9 (Ann Arbor) vs 100.4 (Norwich-New London-Willimantic)
- $100k in Ann Arbor ≈ $99,569 purchasing power in Norwich-New London-Willimantic
- Services drives the gap (+50.4 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MI:CT 100.9→100.4
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE MI × CT
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Ann Arbor
100.9
Cost Index
Norwich-New London-Willimantic
100.4
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Ann Arbor, MI and Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Norwich-New London-Willimantic is 50.4 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Ann Arbor to $99,569 in Norwich-New London-Willimantic, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Ann Arbor
- 93.7
Diff +3.6 RPP
Services
- Ann Arbor
- 98.2
Diff +50.4 RPP
Rents
- Ann Arbor
- 125.3
Diff -31.6 RPP
| Category | Ann Arbor | Norwich-New London-Willimantic | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 100.4 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 97.3 | +3.6 |
| Services | 98.2 | 148.6 | +50.4 |
| Rents | 125.3 | 93.7 | -31.6 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Ann Arbor 100.9
Norwich-New London-Willimantic 100.4
Goods
Ann Arbor 93.7
Norwich-New London-Willimantic 97.3
Services
Ann Arbor 98.2
Norwich-New London-Willimantic 148.6
Rents
Ann Arbor 125.3
Norwich-New London-Willimantic 93.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Ann Arbor would need to be in Norwich-New London-Willimantic for the same purchasing power:
| In Ann Arbor | In Norwich-New London-Willimantic | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,784 | $-216 |
| $75,000 | $74,677 | $-323 |
| $100,000 | $99,569 | $-431 |
| $150,000 | $149,353 | $-647 |
$ in Ann Arbor = in Norwich-New London-Willimantic
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.9 → 100.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Norwich-New London-Willimantic more expensive than Ann Arbor?
Norwich-New London-Willimantic is 0.4% less expensive than Ann Arbor. The overall cost index is 100.4 vs 100.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Norwich-New London-Willimantic equals $100K in Ann Arbor?
A $100,000 salary in Ann Arbor has the same purchasing power as $99,569 in Norwich-New London-Willimantic. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Ann Arbor and Norwich-New London-Willimantic?
Rents in Ann Arbor are indexed at 125.3 while Norwich-New London-Willimantic is at 93.7 (national average = 100). Ann Arbor has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.