Overall
Diff -0.2 RPP
Ann Arbor vs Kingston
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kingston is 0.2% less expensive than Ann Arbor.
0.2% less expensive
Kingston, NY is 0.2% less expensive than Ann Arbor, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.7 vs 100.9). A $100,000 salary in Ann Arbor buys about the same as $99,830 in Kingston; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 100.9 (Ann Arbor) vs 100.7 (Kingston)
- $100k in Ann Arbor ≈ $99,830 purchasing power in Kingston
- Services drives the gap (+35.4 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MI:NY 100.9→100.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE MI × NY
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Ann Arbor
100.9
Cost Index
Kingston
100.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Ann Arbor, MI and Kingston, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Kingston is 35.4 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Ann Arbor to $99,830 in Kingston, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +6.0 RPP
Services
Diff +35.4 RPP
Rents
Diff -15.1 RPP
| Category | Ann Arbor | Kingston | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 100.7 | -0.2 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 99.7 | +6.0 |
| Services | 98.2 | 133.6 | +35.4 |
| Rents | 125.3 | 110.2 | -15.1 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Ann Arbor 100.9
Kingston 100.7
Goods
Ann Arbor 93.7
Kingston 99.7
Services
Ann Arbor 98.2
Kingston 133.6
Rents
Ann Arbor 125.3
Kingston 110.2
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Ann Arbor would need to be in Kingston for the same purchasing power:
| In Ann Arbor | In Kingston | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,915 | $-85 |
| $75,000 | $74,873 | $-127 |
| $100,000 | $99,830 | $-170 |
| $150,000 | $149,746 | $-254 |
$ in Ann Arbor = in Kingston
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.9 → 100.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kingston more expensive than Ann Arbor?
Kingston is 0.2% less expensive than Ann Arbor. The overall cost index is 100.7 vs 100.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Kingston equals $100K in Ann Arbor?
A $100,000 salary in Ann Arbor has the same purchasing power as $99,830 in Kingston. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Ann Arbor and Kingston?
Rents in Ann Arbor are indexed at 125.3 while Kingston is at 110.2 (national average = 100). Ann Arbor has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.