Overall
- Albuquerque
- 95.5
- St. Louis
- 95.1
Diff -0.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. St. Louis is 0.5% less expensive than Albuquerque.
St. Louis, MO-IL is 0.5% less expensive than Albuquerque, NM on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.1 vs 95.5). A $100,000 salary in Albuquerque buys about the same as $99,521 in St. Louis; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NM:MO 95.5→95.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Albuquerque, NM and St. Louis, MO-IL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: St. Louis is 10.1 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Albuquerque corresponds to $99,521 in St. Louis.
Diff -0.5 RPP
Diff +3.9 RPP
Diff -7.9 RPP
Diff -10.1 RPP
| Category | Albuquerque | St. Louis | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.5 | 95.1 | -0.5 |
| Goods | 96.1 | 100.0 | +3.9 |
| Services | 77.9 | 69.9 | -7.9 |
| Rents | 89.2 | 79.0 | -10.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Albuquerque and St. Louis share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 6.0 to 0.5 RPP points. Albuquerque remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (7.0 to 3.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Albuquerque RPP | St. Louis RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 97.0 | 91.0 | 6.0 points Albuquerque higher |
| 2012 | 99.6 | 94.5 | 5.1 points Albuquerque higher |
| 2016 | 96.6 | 94.5 | 2.1 points Albuquerque higher |
| 2020 | 94.2 | 95.2 | 1.0 points St. Louis higher |
| 2024 | 95.5 | 95.1 | 0.5 points Albuquerque higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Albuquerque would need to be in St. Louis for the same purchasing power:
| In Albuquerque | In St. Louis | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,760 | $-240 |
| $75,000 | $74,640 | $-360 |
| $100,000 | $99,521 | $-479 |
| $150,000 | $149,281 | $-719 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.5 → 95.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
St. Louis is 0.5% less expensive than Albuquerque. The overall cost index is 95.1 vs 95.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Albuquerque has the same purchasing power as $99,521 in St. Louis. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Albuquerque are indexed at 89.2 while St. Louis is at 79.0 (national average = 100). Albuquerque has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.