Overall
Diff +4.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 5.2% more expensive than Akron.
Lancaster, PA is 5.2% more expensive than Akron, OH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 93.4). A $100,000 salary in Akron buys about the same as $105,234 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair OH:PA 93.4→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Akron would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Akron | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,617 | +$2,617 |
| $75,000 | $78,926 | +$3,926 |
| $100,000 | $105,234 | +$5,234 |
| $150,000 | $157,851 | +$7,851 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.4 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Lancaster, PA is 5.2% more expensive than Akron, OH, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.9-point overall gap.
Rents leads the difference, with Lancaster 17.0 points higher than Akron. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Akron corresponds to $105,234 in Lancaster.
Diff +4.9 RPP
Diff +7.1 RPP
Diff +10.8 RPP
Diff +17.0 RPP
| Category | Akron | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 93.4 | 98.3 | +4.9 |
| Goods | 93.6 | 100.7 | +7.1 |
| Services | 96.4 | 107.3 | +10.8 |
| Rents | 76.8 | 93.8 | +17.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Akron and Lancaster share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 7.7 to 4.9 RPP points. Lancaster remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 12.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (1.4 to 10.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Akron RPP | Lancaster RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.5 | 100.2 | 7.7 points Lancaster higher |
| 2012 | 95.5 | 97.8 | 2.3 points Lancaster higher |
| 2016 | 95.2 | 99.4 | 4.2 points Lancaster higher |
| 2020 | 93.5 | 97.9 | 4.4 points Lancaster higher |
| 2024 | 93.4 | 98.3 | 4.9 points Lancaster higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Lancaster is 5.2% more expensive than Akron. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 93.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Akron has the same purchasing power as $105,234 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Akron are indexed at 76.8 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.